LOS ANGELES, Feb 26 (Reuters) - The number of people who watched Sunday’s Oscars was down and the critics were less than impressed, but Hollywood’s biggest night is still a top draw for television advertisers.
This year’s telecast - which producers believed could build off 2014’s big audience of 43.7 million - attracted its lowest audience in six years and the oldest demographic ever with a median age of 53.
Despite a 15 percent drop in viewership to 37.3 million, however, it is still worth the price tag for advertisers and broadcaster ABC, analysts said. “It’s definitely a showcase place to be, and they (ABC) never have a problem selling it out year to year,” said Steve Kalb, a director at ad agency Mullen.
This year’s telecast hosted by actor Neil Patrick Harris commanded $1.9 million for 30 seconds of advertising time, up from last year’s $1.76 million, the highest among awards shows. Last year’s Ellen DeGeneres-hosted ceremony earned $95 million in ad revenue, according to Kantar Media. This year’s figure is not yet available. ABC pays $75 million annually to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for TV broadcast rights, said Brad Adgate, the research director at Horizon Media. The contract with Walt Disney Co's ABC and the Academy runs through 2020.
However, the search for a way to attract the younger viewers that advertisers prize most leads many to believe the Academy might have to make long-term changes to the ceremony.
Criticism this year focused on lack of diversity among acting nominees, clumsy jokes and the repeated complaint that it is too long. The show lasted three hours and 40 minutes and went past midnight on the East Coast.
It also hurt that it was a lackluster year at the box office, and only one film that Americans went to see in crowds, “American Sniper,” was in the running for best picture. “It’s up to the Academy to change it,” Adgate said. “It’s up to them to make this awards show more appealing.”
本时文内容由奇速英语国际教育研究院原创编写,禁止复制和任何商业用途,版权所有,侵权必究!