A study published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience suggests music could be a low-cost alternative to medicine for people suffering from carsickness, seasickness, or flight nausea. Unlike drugs that often cause side effects like drowsiness (睡意), music offers a safe and personalized way to relieve discomfort, according to Dr Qizong Yue of Southwest University, the corresponding author of the study.​

The research tested 30 young adults who were moderately prone to motion sickness. They wore EEG caps and sat in a driving simulator that induced carsickness. After feeling queasy, each participant was either given one of four music types (joyful, soft, passionate, sad) or asked to rest quietly. A control group stopped the simulator before getting sick to provide baseline EEG readings.​

The results were surprising. Joyful music reduced carsickness by 57.3%, almost as effectively as soft music (56.7%). Passionate music helped 48.3%, while sad music only cut symptoms by 40% — worse than the 43.3% relief from quiet rest. In short, sad songs made people feel more uncomfortable than doing nothing.​

EEG data pointed to the brain’s occipital lobe (枕叶), the region responsible for processing vision, as a key site of change during motion sickness. Participants who reported feeling sick showed reduced complexity in their EEG signals, a marker of disrupted neural activity. The more their discomfort eased, the more their brain activity returned to baseline. Soft music appeared to work by calming tension and increasing alpha brain wave activity, while joyful music may have engaged reward circuits that distracted participants from discomfort. By contrast, sad music likely amplified negative emotion.

Dr Yue advised: “Listen to cheerful or gentle music when feeling motion sick — it may work for air or sea travel too.” But the study had limits: only 30 participants and a simulated environment. More research with larger, diverse groups in real settings is needed, as well as exploring how personal music tastes affect results. Still, the takeaway is clear: skip sad songs and choose uplifting music.

1.1. What advantage does music have over medicine for motion sickness?

A It takes effect more quickly.

B It is more widely available.

C It is free from side effects.

D It is more convenient to use.

解析：选C。C细节理解题。根据第一段的“Unlike drugs that often cause side effects like drowsiness, music offers a safe and personalized way to relieve discomfort”可知，药物常引发如睡意等副作用，而音乐能提供安全且个性化的缓解不适的方式，由此可知，听音乐比药物更安全。故选C。

2.2. What does the underlined word “queasy” probably mean?

A Unpleasant.

B Unsteady.

C Impatient.

D Uncomfortable.

解析：选D。D词义猜测题。结合第二段语境，实验对象坐在“诱导晕车的驾驶模拟器”中，之后被安排听音乐或安静休息，且对照组“在感到不适前停止模拟器”，可推测“queasy”意为“不舒服的，感到不适的”。故选D。

3.3. What can be inferred about joyful music from the study?

A It likely reduces discomfort by distracting the brain.

B Its effect was slightly weaker than soft music.

C It worked in a similar way to sad music.

D It showed no significant improvement.

解析：选A。A推理判断题。第三段数据显示，欢快音乐缓解晕车率为57.3%，轻柔音乐56.7%，激昂音乐48.3%，悲伤音乐40%，可见欢快音乐的缓解效果在四种音乐中最佳。B、C、D错误。根据第四段倒数第二句的“joyful music may have engaged reward circuits that distracted participants from discomfort”可知，欢快音乐可能激活了奖励回路以分散参与者对不适的注意力。故选A。

4.4. What is a limit of the study? ① Small sample size ②Ignored music types ③ Unreal test environment ④Lack of EEG tests

A ①②

B ①③

C ②③

D ②④

解析：选B。B 细节理解题。根据最后一段中的“But the study had limits: only 30 participants and a simulated environment”可知，研究的局限性包括“模拟环境”（非真实场景），“仅30名参与者”意味着样本量小。故选B。