
Li Yaode, a Chinese vlogger, has drawn wide public attention. His video recording a 2,229-kilometer taxi trip from Chongqing to Lhasain the Xizang Autonomous Region, won him the grand prize of 500,000 yuan from local tourism authorities. He plans to donate most of the money, causing heated online discussions about tourism development, official rewards and online creators’ influence.
Xizang’s tourism department recently launched a reward program for original travel videos. Videos with over five million likes can get the 500,000-yuan grand prize. Li’s 22-minute video fully met the standards and attracted millions of genuine views, so officials promised prompt payment of the prize money.
In the video, Li left Chongqing by electric taxi on June 26 and arrived at the Potala Palace after seven days. Two local drivers took turns driving along National Highway G318, while Li filmed stunning scenery, local food and warm roadside encounters. The video earned over 21 million likes on Douyin within days.
After learning about the award, Li announced his plan. He would give 10,000 yuan to each of the two taxi drivers and donate the remaining money.Internet usershad mixed reactions to his donation. Some hoped he could help poor local families or schools directly, while others advised him to work with Xizang officials to support local villages.
___▲___ Reporters agreed that such prizes could encourage more people to introduce Xizang’s natural sights and traditional culture. Yet they also reminded young creators not to copy Li’s trip blindly. The long drive cost a lot and brings dangers like altitudesickness (高原反应) and sudden bad weather. Some newspapers also suggested the government take into account more useful metrics (指标) besides video likes, such as rising travel bookings brought by these popular online videos.
原创编写 版权所有 侵权必究 每日更新 个性化阅读 英语飙升1.1.What can we know about Li’s video?
A It was about a trip from Lhasa to Chongqing.
B It caused heated online discussions.
C It won a 10,000-yuan prize.
D It was made for travelers.
解析:选B。B细节理解题。根据第一段中“He plans to donate most of the money, causing heated online discussions...”可知,李的计划(即因视频获奖后的捐款决定)引发了激烈的网络讨论,这正是该视频相关事件带来的影响之一,因此选项B正确。根据“His video recording a 2,229-kilometer taxi trip from Chongqing to Lhasa”旅途是从重庆到拉萨,不是拉萨到重庆,故A错误;选项C说视频“获得了1万元奖金”,而原文第一段指出是50万元大奖,奖金数额不符;选项D称视频“为旅行者制作”,文中并未提及该制作目的,属无中生有。故选B。
2.2. What is required to win the 500,000-yuan prize?
A Travel videos with 5 billion likes.
B Any online video about Xizang.
C Videos with the most comments.
D Original travel videos with over 5 million likes.
解析:选D。D细节理解题。第二段明确介绍了西藏旅游部门的奖励计划:“Videos with over five million likes can get the 500,000-yuan grand prize”,且强调是针对“original travel videos”,因此选项D“点赞超过500万的原创旅行视频”完全符合获奖条件。选项A错在将“5百万”误作“50亿”;选项B将范围扩大为“任何关于西藏的在线视频”,忽略了“原创旅行视频”及点赞数要求;选项C以“最多评论”为标准,文中并无此依据。故选D。
3.3. How long did Li’s trip take?
A Two days.
B Five days.
C Seven days.
D Ten days.
解析:选C。C细节理解题。第三段直接给出了行程时长:“Li left Chongqing by electric taxi on June 26 and arrived at the Potala Palace after seven days.” 这里“after seven days”意为七天后到达,即整个行程耗时七天,故选项C正确。其他选项的天数均与原文不符。故选C。
4.4. How much money will Li donate?
A 20,000 yuan.
B 500,000 yuan.
C 480,000 yuan.
D 10,000 yuan.
解析:选C。C数字计算题。第四段提到:“He would give 10,000 yuan to each of the two taxi drivers and donate the remaining money.” 即给两位司机每人1万元,共计2万元。奖金总额为50万元,则捐赠金额为500,000 - 20,000 = 480,000元,故选项C正确。选项A和D只是给出的部分金额,选项B是奖金全额,均不符合他的捐赠计划。故选C。
5.5. What can best be put into the blank “___▲___”?
A Media had balanced opinions.
B Reporters fully supported it.
C The government canceled it.
D The video was not popular.
解析:选A。A推理判断题。最后一段开头空后,记者们一致认为这类奖励能鼓励更多人介绍西藏的风光与文化,紧接着用“Yet”转折,提醒年轻创作者不要盲目模仿,并指出长途旅行的花费与危险,一些报纸还建议政府考虑点赞之外更有用的指标。这种“既肯定又指出问题并提出建议”的表述,属于一种平衡、客观的看法。因此填入“Media had balanced opinions”最能概括本段内容。选项B“完全支持”忽略了转折后的提醒和建议;选项C“政府取消了它”文中完全未提及;选项D“视频不受欢迎”与视频获得超2100万点赞的事实矛盾。故选A。