
Scotland’s Cairngorms National Park covers less than 2% of the UK’s land, yet it shelters a quarter of the country’s rarest and most endangered species. Visitors describe entering a special museum, one that guards secret, precious things. Among its treasures is the aspen (颤杨), the “whispering tree”, whose survival here is far less secure than its name suggests.
These trees grow from the Rocky Mountains to the Arctic Circle, and from North Africa to Japan — a spread that hides a weak position. The cutting of forests and heavy farming all but wiped out British populations; small groups have survived only inside ancient pine woods such as Abernethy, where they stand among other old trees.
Such woods are a clear example of symbiosis — the state in which species live together to survive. A single root system spreads, copies itself, and links tree to tree, so one group can support hundreds of species at every life stage. Stewart Taylor, a local tree expert, has spent decades studying the forest and calls it “a machine for making life”. Despite their uncertain future, he says, they furnish a forest with opportunity.
The nickname is easy to explain: the leaves tremble in the lightest wind, and visitors have compared the sound to a church, or to a whispered conversation. Less easy to explain is what the wood does to the people inside it. Trees pass chemical signals through their roots and the air, and visitors seem to benefit without noticing: studies report lower blood sugar, calmer minds, and stronger protection against illness. The top layer of the forest floor releases oxytocin, a substance that binds mother to child.
Even death has a role. Dying trees provide homes for rare species and, in Taylor’s words, “tell me this woodland is functioning”.
The summer of 2026 brought twelve days of fire to the Cairngorms. Aspens, though, are among the first trees to appear after disaster, and new leaves now flash across the burned hills, and Taylor calls this “a message for the path ahead”.
1.1.What do the underlined words “British populations” in Paragraph 2 refer to?
A The British people.
B Aspen trees in Britain.
C British forests.
D British farmers.
解析:选B。B 词义猜测题。第二段说,砍伐森林和大量农耕几乎把British populations消灭干净(all but wiped out),紧接着又说small groups survive only inside ancient pine woods(小片群落只活在一些古老松林里)。能“被消灭”、又能“存活在松林里”的,只能是树;所以British populations 指的是“英国境内的(颤杨)种群”。这里的population是生态学中的“(某物种的)物种种群”,并非“人口”,属于熟词生义。A项“英国人”是最常见的误读,而下一句“活在松林里”已说明它不可能指人;C项“英国的森林”范围太大,被消灭的并不是所有森林;D项“英国农民”因heavy farming而容易联上,但和“存活在松林里”对不上。故选B。
2.2.What does Taylor think about the wood?
A He sees risk but still values it.
B He believes the wood will recover.
C He thinks visitors should help.
D He doubts the studies of aspens.
解析:选A。A 推理判断题。第三段末尾,Taylor一方面承认Despite their uncertain future,即颤杨的未来不确定;另一方面又指出they furnish a forest with opportunity,即它们仍给森林带来机会。他还把这片林子比作a machine for making life。也就是说,他既看到风险,也看重它的价值。B项把“仍给机会”推成了“会自行恢复”;原文只说到“提供机会”,没有断言它会恢复。C项“游客应当帮忙”文中全无依据;D项“怀疑关于颤杨的研究”与他亲自研究这片林子数十年正好相反。故选A。
3.3.What does the writer suggest about the benefits visitors get?
A They depend on how far they walk.
B They do not require attention.
C They last only during the visit.
D They are reported by the visitors.
解析:选B。B 推理判断题。第四段写的是visitors seem to benefit without noticing,冒号后面列出受益的表现:lower blood sugar, calmer minds and stronger protection against illness。也就是说,游客在毫无察觉的情况下就已经从中获益,由此可推断,获得这些益处并不需要游客主动去留意。A“取决于走多远”、C“只在参观期间有效”都是原文没有提到的条件;D把“研究者的报告”(studies report)错记成了“游客的报告”。故选B。
4.4. What is the main message of the text?
A Wildfires are hard to control.
B Ancient woods are vanishing worldwide.
C Trees only matter to visitors.
D Life in a wood depends on others.
解析:选D。D 主旨大意题。全文反复讲“彼此依赖”:symbiosis是物种共存才能存活,一条根系能养活动植物各阶段的数百个物种,森林释放的oxytocin又是把母亲与孩子连在一起的物质,连枯木都为稀有物种提供栖身之处;合起来传达的是“林子里的生命互相依赖”。A只对应末段那场烧了十二天的火,属局部;B把“英国颤杨几近消失”扩大到“世界范围内的古林都在消失”,文中只谈英国;C把林子对人的意义缩小成“只对游客有意义”,文中还说它维系数百个物种。故选D。