一项围绕观鸟的多元研究
一项围绕观鸟的多元研究

Inside a wooden hide beside a lake in the West Midlands, a group of elderly bird lovers gathers every week. Most of them struggle to recall what happened that morning, and some cannot follow a conversation for long. Yet they come alive the moment a bird appears, a long-billed bird probing the stones or two great crested grebes (凤头䴙䴘) drifting on the water. One of them, a 78-year-old man whom dementia had made quiet and anxious, laughed for the first time in months when someone pointed out a robin.

Scenes like this have begun to interest brain researchers. Erik Wing, at Baycrest in Toronto, compared scans of expert bird lovers with those of beginners while both groups identified birds. In the experts, regions linked to attention, visual perception and recognition were more active, particularly when the birds were unfamiliar. The same regions showed a higher degree of organisation, a quality that normally declines with age. Wing is careful about what this means. Nothing in the data shows whether the differences produced the skill or resulted from the skill. One plausible reading is that years of close looking prompt the brain to adapt.

Skill, however, is not the whole story. A survey of 388 bird lovers in Poland found that those who treated the hobby as central to their lives reported more calm and energy than those who were merely highly skilled. Thisis encouraging news for anyone who cannot name a single species.

Elisabeth Kals, a psychologist in Germany, installed feeding stations outside 65 nursing homes, placed so that residents could watch from indoors. Staff noticed changes within three to four weeks, and after a month watching birds explained a resident’s mood better than age or level of care did. Insurance groups that had helped fund the project have since paid for feeders in more than 400 homes across Bavaria.

The appeal lies in its simplicity. Watching birds demands no equipment beyond a window, no knowledge and no journey; it folds attention, curiosity and small talk into one inexpensive habit. That is rare among treatments, and it may explain how a birdwatching shelter in the English countryside became a routine in German care homes.

原创编写 版权所有 侵权必究 每日更新 个性化阅读 英语飙升

1.1. What does the underlined word “they” in Paragraph 1 refer to?

A Those still able to talk.

B Helpers who came along.

C The elderly people present.

D The birds nearby.

解析:选C。C 词意指代题。第一段先说这群体“大多记不清当天上午的事,有些人也没法长时间听懂一段对话”,紧接着用Yet转折:“they come alive the moment a bird appears”。转折的成立前提是前后指同一批人——正因为记不住、跟不上,才显出“鸟一出现就活过来”的反差,所以they指的是在场的这群老人,选C。A项把范围缩成“还能交谈的人”,若真是这样,“记不住”“跟不上”对这些人的转折就没了对象,逻辑上讲不通;B项“陪同前来的人”全段没有任何交代;D项如果 they 指代鸟儿,就成了“鸟儿在鸟出现时活跃起来”,语义重复且逻辑不通。故选C。

2.2. What does the writer suggest about the brain changes?

A Expertise explains the changes.

B The order remains uncertain.

C Scans deserve little trust.

D Beginners adapt more quickly.

解析:选B。B 推理判断题。原文第二段明确说 “Nothing in the data shows whether the differences produced the skill or resulted from the skill”,即大脑差异与观鸟技能之间究竟是“差异导致技能”还是“技能导致差异”尚不确定,因此B项 “The order remains uncertain” 正确。A项“专业知识解释了这些变化”过于确定,原文只说一种合理解读是多年仔细观察促使大脑适应;C项“扫描不值得信任”曲解文意,作者只是提醒谨慎解释;D项“初学者适应更快”文中没有比较。故选B。

3.3. What did the survey in Poland find?

A Expertise matters more than interest.

B Skill rarely improves mood.

C Devotion brings more benefit.

D Older bird lovers gain most.

解析:选C。C 推理判断题。原文第三段提到波兰调查发现,那些把观鸟爱好视为生活中心的人,比仅仅技能高超的人报告更多的平静和精力,即投入和热爱带来更多益处,因此C项 “Devotion brings more benefit” 正确。A项“专业技能比兴趣更重要”与原文相反;B项“技能很少改善情绪”曲解原文,原文是比较“仅高技能”不如“把爱好视为中心”;D项“老年观鸟者获益最多”文中没有年龄比较。故选C。

4.4. Why does the writer mention the 65 nursing homes?​

A To prove a simple habit works in practice.

B To confirm what the Polish survey predicted.

C To show bird-watching needs expert guidance.

D To explain how the project was funded.

解析:选A。A 推理判断题。原文第四段介绍在65家养老院设置喂鸟点的实验,居民情绪出现改善,第五段点明观鸟的魅力在于简单,这个例子用来证明这种简单的习惯在现实中是有效的。B “证实波兰调查的预判”,波兰调查侧重爱好在生活中的重要性,二者侧重点不一样;C “表明观鸟需要专业指导” 和原文 “no knowledge” 矛盾;D “解释项目如何获得资助” 只是顺带信息,不是举例的目的。故选 A。