六级真题2023年6月第二套 Passage One

时文摘要

我们到底是怎么做到这个地步的?我们过分地保护我们的孩子不受任何伤害;我们仔细检查他们接触过的每一位护理员、教师或医生。然面,尽管如此,有一个在任何情况下都不以孩子们的最大利益为中心的群体,几乎可以不受限制地接近他们。


How on earth did we come to this? We protect our children obsessively from every harm; we scrutinize every carer, teacher or doctor with whom they come into contact. Yet despite all this, one group, which in no way has their best interests at heart, has almost unconstrained access.

We seem to take it for granted that advertisers and marketers are allowed to condition even the youngest children. Before children have even developed a proper sense of their own identity, or learned to handle money, they're encouraged to associate status and self-worth with stuff, and to look to external things such as fame and wealth for validation. We're turning out little consumers rather than young citizens who will value themselves for what they contribute to the society in which they live.
We've reached this point so gradually that many of us have never questioned it. It's crept up on us in the 60 years since advertisers started to target the young and found that they could recruit them to a commercial assault on their parents. We've come to know it as"pester power" or the ability of children to pressure parents to make certain purchases.
Many psychologists, child development experts and educators point to research suggesting that this emerging cradle-to-grave consumerism is contributing to growing rates of low self-esteem, depression and other forms of mental illness.
Not all psychologists agree. There're plenty working hand in glove with a f12bn-a-year industry that has turned the manipulation of adult emotions and desires into an art form—often literally. It's also one that's forever developing new ways to persuade our children to desire material possessions, and because of advertisements' viral effect they only need to infect a few to reach the many. Advertising and marketing can serve a useful purpose for children. Marketing may help socialize children as consumers, inform them about products, and help them carve out unique identities as they reach adulthood.
Then, should we ban all advertising aimed at young children? I say yes.
Of course there'll be plenty of objections to an outright ban on advertising to the under- 11s. There'll be those who argue that would be a breach of freedom of speech and infringe the rights of corporations to brainwash little children into demanding their products.
Most parents hate what advertising does to their children, but we do have the power to end it and let our children grow up free from many of the pressures of consumerism until they're old enough to make their own decisions. And though advertising is only part of an all-pervasive (无处不在的)marketing culture we need to make a start somewhere. Let's ban all advertising targeting children of primary school age and younger now. 

1. 1.Which group of people does the author say has almost unrestricted access to children?

A    Advertisers.

B    Carers.

C    Teachers.

D    Doctors.

2. 2.What kind of people should we enable children to become according to the author?

A    Those who look to fame and wealth for external and ultimate validation.

B    Those who value themselves because of their contribution to society.

C    Those who associate self-worth with the ability to handle money.

D    Those who have developed a proper sense of their own identity.

3. 3. Many child development experts and educators call attention to research that suggests .

A    life-long consumerism is causing more and more cases of psychological problems

B    increasing commercialization of education is eroding many children's self-esteem

C    the growing desire for wealth is contributing to a rising rate of depression

D    the craving for purchasing material things is nurtured throughout one's life

4. 4. What does the author imply about the impact of advertising?

A    It is actually infectious to many rather than aIt is actually infectious to many rather than a few.

B    It is rooted in our desire for material possessions.

C    It is comparable to that of virus.

D    It is literally limited to children.

5. 5.What is the opponents' argument against a complete ban on advertising to young children?

A    It would deprive them of the chance to learn about products.

B    It would render them unable to carve out unique identities.

C    It would breach their freedom as would-be consumers.

D    It would violate the rights endowed upon advertisers.

奇速优课平台

轻松创业线上机构

报名

奇速英语 · 2021英语冬令营

7天学会3年单词

报名

2021中高考英语冲刺

真题阅读30篇

报名

奇速英语同步培优

单元知识点讲解+单元过关手册+常考易错题

学习
更多优质学习内容
课程咨询

四川奇速教育科技有限公司

网站备案号:蜀ICP备14006206号-4
Copyright @ 2018
All Rights Reserved.

联系我们

400-1000-028

黄老师:17760376675
蒋老师:13980503458

奇速优课

奇速英语

咨询客服