Imagine a world where people never wore shoes. Would our feet be better off? For many of us, wearing shoes has been a daily habit since childhood. However, this might not always be the best choice for our feet. Shoes were originally invented to protect feet from injuries and harsh weather, but over time, they have become more about style and comfort than function.

Modern shoes often force our feet into unnatural shapes. Narrow toe boxes, high heels, and rigid soles (鞋底) can restrict natural movement and cause long-term damage. For example, the toes are often squeezed together, leading to deformities. This is why it’s rare to see feet that are truly natural in shape today.

If we never wore shoes, our feet would likely develop differently. They would be stronger and more flexible, with a natural spread of the toes. The arch of the foot would become sturdier, and the heels and balls of the feet would develop protective calluses. This would make our feet better adapted to walking on different surfaces.

Of course, there are drawbacks to going barefoot. Without shoes, feet are more vulnerable to injuries, infections, and extreme weather conditions. However, there is a solution: minimalist or natural footwear. These shoes are designed to mimic walking barefoot by allowing natural movement and providing sensory feedback to the brain. They have wide toe boxes, thin and flexible soles, and no heel elevation. This design helps restore natural foot function and prevent long-term damage.

In conclusion, while shoes are important for protection, traditional designs can harm our feet over time. By choosing natural footwear, we can promote healthier foot development and enjoy the benefits of walking as nature intended.

1. 1. Why does the author mention “narrow toe boxes” and “high heels” in Paragraph 2?

A    To list popular shoe styles.

B    To explain fashion trends.

C    To illustrate harmful designs.

D    To discuss manufacturing methods.

2. 2. What does the author imply about “protective calluses”?

A    They are a sign of poor health.

B    They are undesirable features.

C    They are natural adaptations.

D    They require medical treatment.

3. 3. How does the author develop the argument in Paragraph 4?

A    By rejecting all opposing views.

B    By presenting a balanced solution.

C    By emphasizing extreme positions.

D    By ignoring potential problems.

4. 4. What is the author’s overall attitude towards traditional shoes?

A    Completely approving.

B    Strongly critical.

C    Indifferent and neutral.

D    Cautiously questioning.