A recent performance of the classic Peking Opera “Farewell My Concubine” in Shanghai has captured national attention. Its star was “Scholar 01”, China’s first humanoid robot. Dressed in the elaborate costume of the tragic hero Xiang Yu, it performed alongside human actor Wang Yuchen, moving its arms and shifting its gaze in time with the music. This groundbreaking fusion of ancient art and cutting-edge technology has sparked intense public debate.

For many, the event was fascinating and “full of futuristic charm”. Supporters see it as a creative way to revitalize traditional art. Director Yu Xiang explained that the robot’s precision offers a new way to interpret Peking Opera’s stylized movements. More importantly, the innovation is successfully attracting young audiences. Performance clips became popular on social media, with teenagers suddenly discussing face-painting styles they had never noticed before. Surveys indicate that over 67% of young Chinese believe such collaborations can breathe new life into traditional opera.

However, admiration is not the only reaction. The performance also drew sharp criticism. Skeptics (怀疑者) question whether this is genuine artistic progress or merely technological spectacle. They argue that a robot, while mechanically precise, cannot convey the emotional depth essential to Peking Opera — the quiver (颤抖) in a voice, the meaningful pause, the unspoken connection with the audience. Some also worry about robots crowding out opportunities for human performers.

Educators like the robot’s creator Li Qingdu see practical value, suggesting such technology could lower the learning threshold (门槛) for beginners. Yet even supporters emphasize that robots should complement, not replace, human artists.

Ultimately, the Shanghai experiment serves as a thoughtful meditation on balance. It demonstrates that technology can enrich traditional arts and attract new interest, but should not come at the cost of the human soul and emotional intelligence that define Peking Opera. The future of ancient arts depends on carefully navigating innovation and preservation.

1. 1. What made the Peking Opera performance nationally noticed?

A    The classic plot.

B    The human performer.

C    The musical accompaniment.

D    The robot participant.

2. 2. What can we infer from the popularity of performance clips on social media?

A    Traditional Peking Opera is no longer popular.

B    The robot has completely replaced human actors.

C    The innovation attracts youth’s interest in Peking Opera.

D    Social media only promotes modern art forms.

3. 3. Why do some people criticize the use of robots in Peking Opera?

A    They think robots are too expensive.

B    They believe robots lack the emotional depth.

C    They worry robots will damage the stage equipment.

D    They are afraid that robots will change the plot.

4. 4. What is the author’s attitude towards the combination of technology and traditional Peking Opera?

A    Totally opposed.

B    Strongly supportive.

C    Optimistic but cautious.

D    Indifferent.